Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.